Originally published on: November 29, 2024
Craig Wright, the Australian computer scientist and businessman claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous Bitcoin creator, faced another setback as the United Kingdom Court of Appeal denied his appeal. This decision marks the end of Wright’s legal battles to prove his identity.
In a recent ruling, the court highlighted Wright’s false arguments, including those suspected to be generated with artificial intelligence. The court dismissed his appeal grounds, labeling them as “multiple falsehoods” and relying on “fictitious authorities.” One such case cited by the court was deemed to be “AI-generated hallucinations.”
The rejection of Wright’s appeal upholds the previous High Court ruling, where it was determined that he is not Nakamoto. This decision comes after years of controversy and legal challenges faced by Wright, with many in the crypto community dubbing him as ‘Faketoshi.’
Despite Wright’s persistent claims, including filing libel lawsuits against prominent figures in the crypto space, the courts have consistently ruled against him. The latest ruling reinforces the conclusion that Wright is not the creator of Bitcoin.
As investigators and journalists continue to search for Nakamoto’s true identity, the saga surrounding Wright serves as a cautionary tale about authenticity and credibility in the digital asset space. Despite his efforts, Wright’s claims have been debunked, adding another layer of intrigue to the mystery of Bitcoin’s origins.